• HOME
    • About
    • Expectations v Reality
    • Accessing Information
    • The Rule of Law
    • Advocacy - McKenzie Friend
    • Black-Eyed Susan - Symbol of Justice
    • Site Administrator
    • Meet Our Mascot
    • Big Girls Don't Cry
  • MEDIA RELEASES
    • Media - 2024 to 2025
    • Media - 2021 to 2023
    • Media Policy
  • INJURIOUS CLAUSES
    • GIPA Act - Section 14 Table 3(f)
    • GIPA Act - Section 110
    • GIPA Act - Section 110 Costs
    • NCAT Act - Section 49
    • NCAT Act - Section 60
    • NCAT Act - Section 64
  • IMPOTENT ACTS
  • FORUM
    • Understand the Executive Narcissist
    • Stand-Out NSW Agencies
    • Rate Your Agency
    • Rate the IPC
    • Rate The NCAT
    • Rate NSW Dept of Justice
    • Rate NSW Office of Local Govt
    • Documenting Agency Responses
    • Ministerial Enquiries & Petitions
Office of the NSW Information & Privacy Commissioner Wins Public Award as a "Stand-Out Agency" for Obstructing Legitimate Public Debate & Comment on a Social Media Platform, 01.02.2023
The Office of the NSW Information & Privacy Commissioner, IPC, has today received a public award highlighting the unwarranted blocking of NSW Freedom of Information from commenting on its Twitter posts. The block follows a warning letter issued by the IPC in December 2022, reiterating it did not appreciate the comments, classifying them as "not respectful of individuals and governmet agencies or that they are considered offensive and misleading." The IPC's Ian Naylor, Director of Business Improvement, further stated that comments did not adhere to the IPC's Social Media Terms of Use, viewable in its IPC Social Media Policy. The IPC wrote directly to NSW FOI's Telina Webb stating a review could be sought with the Commissioner Elizabeth Tydd CEO, which Ms Webb has requested but which she has little faith in. "A review of the IPC's Social Media Terms of Use shows the policy, which is not legislated, to be predomintely directed towards IPC staff. Only a very small percentage of the document actually refers to third parties. It is difficult to see whether or not the document was written for the whole of population, however even if it was it is not enforceable to those outside of the IPC's control," commented Ms Webb. "The IPC makes itself available to a number of key stakeholders, as detailed in an IPC document provided under corporate enquiry in mid-2022, with notably the public listed as the top stakeholder. However, the public continues to have difficulty accessing either of the Commissioners, reducing it to the arduous task of letter writing, leaving the public feeling brushed aside and disregarded if not completely excluded from rightful access to the government's nominated subject matter expert resource. And of course the public should be cautious about writting too many letters as this can often result in authors being labelled as vexatious, harassing, and problematic, as seems to be the common theme amongst NSW Government Agencies. As with blocking of Twitter posts, the IPC is able to place harsh immovable restrictions on letter writing. NSW Government Agencies use the same recipe only printed on a different letterhead." Currently those on the stakeholder list are able to secure the IPC for regular speaking engagements and direct educational seminars, however the public struggles to get a single appointment. In recent NSW Civil & Administrative Tribunal (NCAT) proceedings, the NSW Crown Solicitor's Kiri Mattes informed the NCAT that it "was the job of the IPC to improve the public's general understanding of the GIPA Act." Yet the IPC provides little more for the assistance of the public than limited Fact Sheets and childish animations, along with its Twitter posts. The Twitter posts circulate very basic information on topics inclusive of accessing government information, protecting privacy, and a great deal concerning the speaking engagements of the Commissioners and the associations they support. "Engaging directly with the IPC's Twitter posts is an acceptable way for the public to communicate with the IPC, to contribute to important conversations and to express concerns with the current legislation. After all, it is a public social media platform. Clearly the IPC is not interested in public debate though, and this decision to block the ability to legitimately comment and robustly contribute to relevant public debate and relevant issues sends the clear message that the IPC has no interest in what the public has to say, and that it considers social media a one-way street for disseminating its selective messages. It is what the public has suspected for some time, only now there is no question mark of doubt." The comments claimed by the IPC to be disrespectful of individuals and governmet agencies or that they are considered offensive and misleading are viewable here, where the public will be invited to comment on whether or not it agrees with the IPC and give an opion about the content of NSW FOI's Tweets. NSW Freedom of Information feels this award is well-deserved and possibly overdue. Contact Mr Ian Naylor, Director of Business Development IPC on 1800 472 679
DraftCom Pty Ltd t/as NSW Freedom of Information ABN: 87 076 511 941 PO Box 8030 Marks Point NSW 2280 P: 1300 679 364 or 1300 NSW FOI F: (02) 8246 3484 Hrs: Monday to Friday - 9.30am to 4.30pm
E: info@nswfreedomofinformation.net
Copyright (c) 2021. All rights reserved. Created in Sitebeat.
Acknowledgement of First Nations Australia We acknowledge the Awabakal people as the Traditional Custodians of this area. We recognise their continuing connection and protection of the land, the waterways, and ecosystems since time immemorial. We extend our respect to all First Nations people and we respect the Elders past and present.
Black-Eyed Susan - Symbol of Justice
DISCLAIMER: The Information on this Site does not constitute legal advice, and is not intended to be a substitute for legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. The information on this Site is general in nature, comprises publically available information, as well as the personal experiences and opinions of members of the community. NSW Freedom of Information asks every member of the community to respect the content of this Site, some of which has been provided by trusting third parties, and asks that permission is sought first before using the information herein, sharing the information herein, or copying or republishing the information herein.

We use cookies to enable essential functionality on our website, and analyze website traffic. By clicking Accept you consent to our use of cookies. Read about how we use cookies.

Your Cookie Settings

We use cookies to enable essential functionality on our website, and analyze website traffic. Read about how we use cookies.

Cookie Categories
Essential

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our websites. You cannot refuse these cookies without impacting how our websites function. You can block or delete them by changing your browser settings, as described under the heading "Managing cookies" in the Privacy and Cookies Policy.

Analytics

These cookies collect information that is used in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are.