• HOME
    • About
    • Site Administrator
    • Black Eyed Susan - Symbol of Justice
    • Creating a Moral Panic
    • Expectations v Reality
    • All About NIPPN
    • Accessing Information
    • The Rule of Law
    • CRAP Act 2026
    • CRAP Policy
    • Meet Our Mascot
    • Big Girls Don't Cry
  • MEDIA RELEASES
    • Media - 2026 to 2027
    • Media - 2024 to 2025
    • Media - 2021 to 2023
    • Media - TIME MACHINE
    • FOI Forensic Series
    • Media Policy
  • INJURIOUS CLAUSES
    • GIPA Act - Section 14 Table 3(f)
    • GIPA Act - Section 110
    • GIPA Act - Section 110 Costs
    • NCAT Act - Section 49
    • NCAT Act - Section 60
    • NCAT Act - Section 64
  • IMPOTENT ACTS
  • FORUM
    • Understand the Executive Narcissist
    • Stand-Out NSW Agencies
    • Rate Your Agency
    • Rate the IPC
    • Rate The NCAT
    • Rate NSW Dept of Justice
    • Rate NSW Office of Local Govt
    • Agency Responses & Open Letters
    • Ministerial Enquiries & Petitions
When Does Review Become Repetition? NCAT to Consider the Boundaries of GIPA Act Proceedings, 21.07.2026
The NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal is considering a significant question at the intersection of government transparency, administrative justice, and the principle that legal disputes must ultimately come to an end.
The proceedings concern section 110 of the *Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW)* and the Tribunal’s power to restrain further proceedings where matters have already been determined.
The issue arises in the context of a fourth return to the Tribunal involving the same parties and the same underlying government information dispute. The proceedings raise the question of whether matters that have already passed through the legal process can be repeatedly reopened, or whether final determinations must be given effect to protect fairness and confidence in the justice system.
Freedom of information laws exist to promote transparency and accountability by allowing access to government-held information and providing mechanisms for review. Those rights are fundamental to open government.
However, the administration of justice also depends on finality. Parties who have participated in proceedings and obtained a final determination must be able to rely on that outcome, and public resources must not be consumed by repeated litigation over issues that have already been resolved.
The Tribunal’s consideration of section 110 will therefore examine a broader question: how should the law balance the public interest in transparency with the equally important public interest in certainty, fairness, and the integrity of administrative decision-making?
The matter is being closely watched by those interested in freedom of information law, administrative accountability, and the safeguards that ensure review processes remain effective, fair, and sustainable. Proceeding DetailsTribunal: NSW Civil and Administrative TribunalLegislation: Government Information (Public Access) Act 2009 (NSW)Matter: Webb & Ors v Dept of Communities & Justice & OrsNCAT Reference: AP 2026 - 00139493Hearing Date: Friday 24th July 2026Time: 2.15pmVenue: NCAT Goulburn Street Sydney (Room allocation to be advised) Members of the media, legal practitioners, administrative law observers, transparency advocates, and interested members of the public are invited to attend and observe the proceedings, subject to Tribunal directions and applicable access requirements. Media and Public Enquiries:Telina Webb, 0493 211 635
Contact us using this form to comment on this article.
Thank you!
We have received your submission.
Error
Bad respond
DraftCom Pty Ltd t/as NSW Freedom of Information ABN: 87 076 511 941 PO Box 8030 Marks Point NSW 2280 P: 1300 679 364 or 1300 NSW FOI F: (02) 8246 3484 Hrs: Monday to Friday - 9.30am to 4.30pm
E: info@nswfreedomofinformation.net
Copyright (c) 2021. All rights reserved. Created in Sitebeat.
Acknowledgement of First Nations Australia We acknowledge the Awabakal people as the Traditional Custodians of this area. We recognise their continuing connection and protection of the land, the waterways, and ecosystems since time immemorial. We extend our respect to all First Nations people and we respect the Elders past and present.
Black-Eyed Susan - Symbol of Justice
DISCLAIMER: The Information on this Site does not constitute legal advice, and is not intended to be a substitute for legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. The information on this Site is general in nature, comprises publically available information, as well as the personal experiences and opinions of members of the community. NSW Freedom of Information asks every member of the community to respect the content of this Site, some of which has been provided by trusting third parties, and asks that permission is sought first before using the information herein, sharing the information herein, or copying or republishing the information herein.

We use cookies to enable essential functionality on our website, and analyze website traffic. By clicking Accept you consent to our use of cookies. Read about how we use cookies.

Your Cookie Settings

We use cookies to enable essential functionality on our website, and analyze website traffic. Read about how we use cookies.

Cookie Categories
Essential

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our websites. You cannot refuse these cookies without impacting how our websites function. You can block or delete them by changing your browser settings, as described under the heading "Managing cookies" in the Privacy and Cookies Policy.

Analytics

These cookies collect information that is used in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are.